Michelson Morley To Einstein – From Science To Scientism


Michelson-Morely Experiment in 1887

The Michelson-Morley Experiment is taught in our schools as an integral part of Einstein’s theories on relativity and the non-existence of ether [i]. What is not so commonly taught is that Einstein was forced to invent the theory of relativity in response to the findings of experiments by Michelson, Morley and others.

albert michelson edward morley photo portrait Screenshot from 2017-05-03 15:41:32.png
Professor Albert Abraham Michelson (Nobel Prise winning Physicist)[1] & Professor Edward Williams Morley [2]
By developing an interferometer that could split a beam of light and send it in different directions (e.g. with the alleged spin of the earth and perpendicular to the spin), Michelson and Morley were able to determine the stationary nature of the earth.


The original purpose of this experiment was to prove the existence of ether. According to the theory, light should move through the ether at different speeds, depending on your relative movement through space. However, since the earth is not ‘moving through space’ [ii] the results were ‘nil’, and it was found the light was received from 16 different directions without any tell-tale interference fringe patterns.

interference fringe patterns Screenshot from 2017-05-03 21:59:36.png

This line of scientific enquiry was later repeated and refined by Nordmeyer (1903), Michelson-Gale (1925) and Professor Georges M. M. Sagnac [3] in 1913.

Sagnac determined an effect of light velocity that is still utilised today and forms the basis of operation for modern ring laser gyroscopes [4].

“Practical applications of the Sagnac Effect

The Sagnac Effect is employed in current technology. One use is in Inertial guidance systems. Ring interferometers are extremely sensitive to rotations, which need to be accounted for if an inertial guidance system is to return correct results.”

The experiment in 1887 consisted of the interferometer being mounted on a heavy stone block, carried by a wooden disc floating on a tank of mercury. Due to contested variables such as height above sea level, exposure to elements and temperature, the experiment was repeated at different locations and under different conditions by several scientists over several years, including R. J. Kennedy and K. K. Illingworth (1927) and it was even conducted in a Balloon at 2500 meters by Piccard and Stahel between 1926 – 28.

No trace of earth’s motion was ever found.

These experiments have been known about and ignored or misinterpreted for over a century now and they formed the catalyst for Einstein to spew forth his faulty theory of relativity [4.1] The theory of relativity entirely and conveniently ‘did away with’ the ether, and it remains a fundamental tenet of the Religion of Scientism (or “Trust Me!” Science) to this day.

“The failure to detect any influence of the earth’s motion on the velocity of light really formed the starting point of Einstein’s theory of relativity” – Encyclopedia Britannica

Search for alternative or even impartial interpretations for these world halting experiments today, and one will have to dig deep to find a paper that dares stray from the accepted, indoctrinated, dogmatic scriptures (text books) of ‘monkey-man science’.

It seems the further back in history one delves we find a far more open, honest and non-centrally controlled, critical thinking base to draw from [4.2], Gerrard Hickson is just one example

The Michelson-Morley experiment from Kings Dethroned by Gerrard Hickson (1922) chapter 11 (pictured below)[5]

“…the result showed that the earth did not move at all!

‘The Motion through the æther was NIL,’ …

But the world of astronomy has not accepted that result, for it continues to preach the old dogma ; it appears that they are willing to accept the decisions of physicists when it suits their case, but reject them when otherwise. And so they still maintain the fabulous theory that the earth is rushing through space…”

stationary earth kings dethroned p60-61 Screenshot from 2017-05-03 15:12:56.png

“Even then astronomers were determined to hold on to their ancient theories, and deny the facts which had been twice demonstrated by the best means known to modern physical science”

Stationary earth kings dethroned p62-63 end Screenshot from 2017-05-03 15:14:23.png

In 1986 The US Air Force repeated the Michelson-Morley experiment, and although the write-up in Nature Journal Volume 322 is deliberately convoluted, the existence of ether and the stationary nature of earth, was once again proven [6]


The article above is discussed in this video with Greg Braden (former Technical Operations Manager for Cisco Systems)[7]

“We may therefore say that the broad result of a series of experiments of Michelson-Morley type is that no motion of the earth through the ether can be detected by an influence on the velocity of light.” – Encyclopedia Britannica (1959)

The true nature of science has lost it’s way …. it’s no longer about observation, measurement, testability and repeatability. Science today has become a religion of faith, trust and belief in greater men than we. The masses now need to rely on the testimony of CERN, NASA [7.1], The United Nations [7.2] and other non-accountable sources for fundamental building blocks that make up our history, cosmology, nature and beginnings.

The Michelson-Morley experiment, along with others such as Airy and Rowbotham [8], remain unchallenged to this day. No one can show the curve or the spin of earth, however plenty can demonstrate using the scientific method, that earth is a stationary plane.

By John Savage (@SwearyG)

Further reading:

Was Einstein a shitbag?

Was Foucault a Fraud?

Resources For The Stationary Plane

The Religion Of Scientism: A Steaming Pile of Peer Review

Resources For The Stationary Plane

(This section will be updated as and when)






“Samuel Birley Rowbotham, under the pseudonym ‘Parallax’, lectured for two decades up and down Britain promoting his unique flat earth theory. This book, in which he lays out his world system, went through three editions, starting with a 16 page pamphlet published in 1849 and a second edition of 221 pages published in 1865. The third edition of 1881 (which had inflated to 430 pages) was used as the basis of this etext.

Rowbotham was an accomplished debater who reputedly steamrollered all opponents, and his followers, who included many well-educated people, were equally tenacious.

Zetetic Astronomy is a key work of flat-earth thought. If you ever have to debate the flat earth pro or con, this book is a complete agenda of each point that you’ll have to argue.” (Quote from sacred-texts.com)


Also, see if Rowbotham was a nutter, here

Kings dethroned : a history of the evolution of astronomy from the time of the Roman empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing series of blunders founded upon an error made in the second century B.C.

Published 1922


This unusual early work on ‘Flat Earth Theory’ was originally published in 1901. It comprises a comprehensive series of essays which use scripture, reason and fact to (attempt to) prove that the earth is not a planet. The text makes for an entertaining and informative read, providing a wonderful insight into the philosophy of a bygone age. Its chapters include discussions of: The Adamic Creation, The Nebular Hypothesis: Examinatin of three Alleged Proofs of the World’s Globarity, The Horizontality of Land and Water Proved, The Sun, according to the Scriptures, The Deluge-Biblical Account, The Great Deep a Proof that the Earth is not a Planet… and much, much more!


Terra firma : the earth not a planet, proved from scripture, reason and fact

by Scott, David Wardlaw

Published 1901




Alex Gleason 1893 – Is The Bible From Heaven. Is The Earth A Globe

Scientifically and Geometrically Demonstrated (1893)



Zetetic Cosmogony: or Conclusive Evidence that the World is not a Rotating Revolving Globe but a Stationary Plane Circle

Zetetic Astronomy

by Lady Blount (Zeteo), Albert Smith (Zetetes)


The Earth Stands Fast

By Professor C Schoepffer-1900

Earth stand fast front cover Screenshot from 2017-06-21 13:31:04.png

The Great Gyroscope Bearing Friction Test (finally)

[UPDATED] Edited version of both gyroscope experiments (far more viewer friendly)

Since uploading the original 6hr gyroscope test to determine whether the earth was turning or not, I have been keen to run a test confirming the bearing in the gyroscope gimbal was sensitive enough for the job at hand. This sounded like an easy enough task, but after a number of attempts with bits of things I had lying around, I soon found out it was actually quite tricky. The experiment is a follow-up to the original 6hr gyroscope
experiment found here
or the much more palatable 3min summery here:
The purpose of the experiment was to test whether the friction in the main bearing of my gyroscope gimbal would be strong enough to overcome the proposed slow rotation of the Earth The initial experiment spanned 6 hrs and was designed to demonstrate the Earth rotation (ala Foucault 1852), however, as predicted the gyroscope didn't move at all. The YouTube comments suggested (some quite rationally & politely) that friction in the bearing was to blame for the non-movement, and invalidated the whole thing. (click the images to enlarge)
There was even a response from the manufacturing company owner 
The discussions carried on on Twitter too
About  year ago I contacted the owner of the manufacturing company that made 
the Precision Gyroscope and had some in-depth discussion on the topic.
Mr. Turner was convinced that his Precision Gyroscope was not capable of 
registering any movement of the earth, [wait for it] due to the amount of friction on the main bearing, and therefore it was not capable of registering 15 degrees
of movement every hour, or the rotation of the earth.
I maintained that it would be sensitive enough, due to the high 12,000 rpm 
being able to generate more than ample energy to overcome any bearing 
friction from an already precision tooled main bearing.
This was, of course, just my opinion.

Unfortunately Mr. Turner has not been back on twitter since we talked, but 
I will email him shortly to inform him of the results.
glenn turner gyroscope twitter Screenshot from 2017-01-08 223740.png 

So, I've been working on a viable way to #TESTIT

In order to test this opinion, I obtained a high torque 24 hour clock mechanism 
where the hour hand shaft rotated 360 degrees in 24 hours (same as the 
proposed spin of the earth)
I attached a platform to this hour hand shaft and placed the gyroscope 
on top of the platform
gyro friction 2 Screenshot from 2017-01-09 18-50-21.png

I could see two possible outcomes

If the gyroscope was not sensitive enough to register the hour hand turning, then the entire gyroscope and gimbal would have rotated with the 15 degree per hour platform.

Alternatively, should the gyroscope be sensitive enough for the job, then we would see the gimbal legs move with the platform, BUT the gyroscope would remain ‘rigid in space’ and pointing in the same direction it was when it was spun up.

[Unedited raw version)

As we will see from this initial 2 hour test, the gyroscope performed perfectly and remained rigid, thus demonstrating that it IS sensitive enough to register a rotation rate of 15 degrees per hour, or 360 degrees per 24 hours., or the claimed rotation of the spinning ball earth


So What Does This All Mean

Though the video is mind numbingly boring, despite something actually moving this
time, It’s significance is literally world stopping

What this means is that the main criticism regarding the initial “Spin of the Earth Detection Experiment” has now been shown to be unwarranted. Meaning the 6hr non-rotation  demonstration and results still stand, unchallenged.

Via the Scientific Method –


[PS. Please feel free to provide any counter evidence that refutes this, but I do mean actual evidence not just opinion from the peanut gallery]

Flat Earth FAQs by Research Royal Rife

Flat Earth: Refraction! Stick and Shadow, Mirage, Experiments, FAQ, Documentary, AWESOME!

Flat Earth FAQ

What are the greatest proofs of a flat earth?

If the earth was a ball, we can calculate the curvature at 8 inches per mile squared (8x^2). This means for example, that at 15 miles away we should have a 150 foot drop. This would easily hide islands, boats, lighthouses, cities and so much more. However that is not what we see. In fact, we can sometimes see 50 plus miles away on a clear day which should be impossible. Since it would result in thousands of feet of curvature. Even at 15 miles there should be a staggering 150 foot drop. However boats, islands and many other things are easily seen at that distance. There is an overwhelming amount of videos showing this. So the myth of things disappearing over the water line has other causes. Over the water there is a lot of refraction and extremely dense air which can occasionally block the bottom of buildings and boats. This air and refraction can cause “Inferior Mirage”, “Fata Morgana” and “Superior Mirage” which can cause light to bend up or down. Air to dense water bends down, dense water to less dense air bends up. Temperature can effect this as well. Air density can block things that are too far away like looking through 1000 sheets of glass. Compare to a foggy day where you can’t see even a few feet in front of you. However, things are seen even at 100 miles away such as Corsica which would be over a mile of curvature. There are too many examples of this to ignore. Also independent high altitude balloon footage not fitted with a fish eye lens shows no signs of curvature even at 20+ miles of altitude. There are so many proofs for example the lack of observable spin, longitude lines and distances over the southern hemisphere, experiments that invalidate curvature and so forth. All of the best information on the subject is scattered throughout the internet and YouTube. However there are priceless gems of information in corners of the internet. A good place to start looking for proof is in Eric Dubays “200 proofs the earth is not a spinning globe”. It should be stated here, that the flat earth movement is about disproving the globe theory and providing a superior model to replace it with. It is a search for truth using science and it is a model of fewer assumptions.

How does the sun set on a flat earth?

Continue reading