Flat Earth – Heliocentrism Expires August 21, 2017?

 

total eclipse Screenshot from 2017-08-02 23:03:52.png

Dear Science: Why does the eclipse shadow travel from west to east?

Did you hear that? “The moon orbits twice as fast as the earth spins”? Now before you slip in helio head-space and point out that the moon travels on it’s orbit at a supposed 2288mph compared the the earth’s supposed spin edge velocity of 1040mph at the equator, which will no doubt form the basis for NASA’s ‘plausible deniability’ in this gaff, listen again. Not only does the NASA ‘Scientist’ say this, he also motions the same with his hands and then an animation showing the moon orbiting the earth nearly 3 times in one 24hr day is shown. I’d like to just point out that ‘if’ the moon orbited the earth twice or more a day, all the phases of the moon would be seen multiple times a day. However the impossibility of the moon phases in the heliocentric theory has never stopped the attempted indoctrination before…. Moving on.

The next animation is what we were all taught in heliocentric Science as to the relationship between the moon’s orbit and the earth’s spin (top left graphic)

NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013: Moon with Additional Graphics

So 4 years ago, NASA (and every ‘Science’ book out there today) were saying  the moon orbits the earth in 27-29 days – What changed?

Full NASA Article here:

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/2013-moon-phases.html

To explain the 2017 eclipse NASA are having to fudge everything. I’ve seen numerous animations where the earth is spinning from East to West, or the sun is moving and causing a pivoting shadow. Whatever happens, this eclipse will probably be the most watched, analysed and modelled event in a long time. Thanks to Flat Earth realisation.

Following are the arguments for and against the West to East shadow movement caused by the August eclipse and the size of the moon’s shadow on the Earth

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth – Part 2

Flat Earth Ground’n’Pounds the Globe

Flat Earth – Heliocentrism Expires August 21, 2017

Flat Earth Eclipse Chat (feat. ‘Flat Earth Math’)

But as with most things on this flat earth, not all agree this is not possible on the ball

The Globe Model Of The Solar Eclipse Is Correct. Not Proof of Flat Earth.

Then I saw this animation on Globebusters (timestamped), which actually makes some sense, but is not how the NASA scientist tried to explain it in the first video.

Full show here

However, one inaccuracy in this animation is that the  moon has been positioned 13 earth diameters away from earth, when the heliocentric model has the moon at 30 earth diameters away.

eclipse animation 13 earth away globebustersScreenshot from 2017-07-31 21:33:08.png

Whether this will change the outcome of the eclipse, I’m not sure as yet, but I will be following it with interest

So, as always, you decide.

I’ll be updating this thread as and when new analysis comes alone. I don’t think this will be the last we’ll hear of this.

JS

UPDATES

Here’s a

360 Study For Total Solar Eclipse At 2017 August 21 In 8K from @Zproxy

 

More modelling from NASA showing moon’s orbit faster that the earth’s spin

A New View of August’s Total Solar Eclipse

 

This was probably the video that made me reconsider the West to East shadow movement (why NASA couldn’t have explained this is anyone’s guess)

In the video above the following comment is made

Responsible flatearthers could try to understand the heliocentric model a little better…”

And this statement may well be true, however when we are presented with NASA’s so-called scientists trying to explain how the moon orbits the earth nearly 3 times a day, shows models of this and claims it’s always been this way, then is it any wonder that most of the population is in confusion about what is actually happening in the skys above us?

The video also makes the observation that

I have yet to come across any open world type solar system simulations where you can fly around in a perfect working model”

Why don’t we have these tools available to the public? Maybe the bigger question should be why hasn’t NASA got these tools and accurate simulations in order to explain the eclipse without butchering 500 years of heliocentric fudging in an attempt to reconcile the West to East shadow?

This was an honest look at the heliocentric model, highlighting the many other anomalies which still need answers

And this is (of course) what’s likely happening on our stationary plane in August 2017

Some great AutoCAD & 3D Studio Max work presented by Rob Durham

And here’s a great simple demonstration by a twitter friend Civilian X, which also shows how the shadow can be cast smaller that the casting body

 

Tobacco – Smokin’ the Propaganda

nicotiana-tobacco-plant-screenshot-from-2017-01-24-195735

So, it came to a point in time when I decided, as a researcher & a smoker, to find out about the horrors of tobacco. I figured I would scare the crap out of myself with the cold, hard facts about my awful vice, and have no other reason but to give up & live happily ever after.

I secretly hoped there was a conspiracy at play, and that the true amount of damage the evil weed was inflicting was, some how, not as bad as I’d been told my whole life. What I ended up finding was a rabbit hole of hidden studies, skewed statistics and out right fraud, leaving me with the resolute determination not to give up any time soon.

Let me clarify this from the beginning, I’m not talking about your branded packet cigarette here, I am talking about rolling tobacco, as pure as you can obtain & preferably home grown. So, from my research, it turns out there could be a very plausible reason why the Establishment does not want us to have access to mind altering substances such as nicotine and cannabinoids ….

“Increasingly, studies are beginning to show that complex information processing, and perhaps consciousness itself, may result from coordinated activity among many parts of the brain connected by bundles of long axons. Cognitive problems may occur when these areas don’t communicate properly with each other. […]

Using nicotine, they stimulated the axon to determine how it would affect a signal the brain cell sent to the cortex. Without applying nicotine, about 35 percent of the messages sent by the brain cell reached the cortex. But when nicotine was applied to the axon, the success rate nearly doubled to about 70 percent” [1]

“Nicotine DOUBLES the efficiency of our thinking. Hmmm… I think that makes it pretty clear why the PTB (Powers That Be) wish to stamp out smoking. After all, as one comment to the article mentioned, “if our immunity to emotional manipulation and psychopathic propaganda is directly proportional to the cortical control we can exert over the knee-jerk emotional reactions programmed into the amygdala. If smoking can DOUBLE the effective communication between the cortex and other parts of the brain, then what does that say about efforts to do away with smoking in the general population? Can’t have any of the hysterical sheeple accidentally waking up and thinking rationally about their actions.” [1]

As another ‘motive’ we could look at comparative costs, a tobacco product in 1994 was £2.40, it’s now nearly £10. That’s a nice little earner for the Establishment and cancer nazis. In 2012-13 the UK Government Mafia trousered £12 Billion from tobacco revenue (That’s nearly a fifth of the NHS budget. They plan on raising this cost by another 50% by 2020, but that’s beyond the remit of this blog post.

The proposals, put forward in a document by the Independent Cancer Taskforce, are part of the latest attempt to drastically cut down cancer deaths.

Currently, a packet of 20 cigarettes costs about £9.60, and tobacco is seen as being the main cause of cancer, followed by obesity.

The report suggests the 50 per cent price hike could be put into place by 2020.
(as reported in some controlled rag) [2]

So smoking is “seen” as being the main cause of cancer eh?

Well lets have a closer look at whether there is any evidence to back up such claims which inevitably domino on to what can only been described as ‘robbing us blind’ taxes. Have you seen the cost differences just across Europe? It’s the same product so why the enormous difference in price?

tobacco prices costs over EU europe Screenshot from 2017-01-24 20:22:47.png

For as long as I’ve been buying beer from the supermarkets it’s been possible to get a can of weak pish for 50p (using promotions and the football events etc). The price of a single can would be way over £2 by now if the Government had taxed it in line with tobacco, but I can still get nearly a pint for 50p today. Of course, the price of a pint in a local boozer has sky-rocketed along with tobacco, as they can’t have us socialising and communicating with each other, now can they. The last time I bought a pint in Britain it was £4.50 and that was a while ago. Tell me, would you pay £4.50 for a pint in the non-smoking pub, or would you pay 50p for nearly a pint in the comforts of your ‘own rulz’ realm at home?

Now this should tell you an awful lot about the motivations behind the ‘apparent’ vices our government pushes us towards and steers us away from – it’s called social engineering

bertrand-russell-mutton-quote-screenshot-from-2016-07-18-135950

Of course, the Establishment would like nothing better than to ban tobacco outright, but they’ve learnt from past attempts that the only way is by pricing most people out of the vice. This is a not so veiled display of taxing the poor and financial discrimination, but there is nothing new under this Sun.

smoking-ban-3-screenshot-from-2017-01-24-225009smoking-ban-2-screenshot-from-2017-01-24-224952smoking-bans-already-tried-screenshot-from-2017-01-24-224805

We have all seen the ‘nocebo’ inducing anti-smoking propaganda, shoved down our throat from day 1, so below is a collection of ‘alternative’ articles, studies & history you may not have been made aware of. The mental prisoners of peer review will be screaming at this point, but in reality there are dozens of studies & papers available for those that actually go looking.

As always, you decide…

 

The Smoking Gun

“Even blind faith needs a system of positive reinforcement, which in this case became the advertising agencies and the media. Suddenly the television screens were flooded with images of terribly blackened “smoker’s lungs”,

black lungs Screenshot from 2017-01-24 17:16:31.png

 …with the accompanying mantra that you will die in horrible agony if you don’t quit now. It was all pathetic rubbish of course. On the mortuary slab the lungs of a smoker and non-smoker look an identical pink, and the only way a forensic pathologist can tell you might have been a smoker, is if he finds heavy stains of nicotine on your fingers, a packet of Camels or Marlboro in your coat pocket, or if one of your relatives unwisely admits on the record that you once smoked the demon weed.”

 

The Truth About Tobacco with Richard White

http://www.sott.net/article/299965-The-Health-and-Wellness-Show-21-The-Truth-About-Tobacco-with-Richard-White

Right click to download, left click to stream online

http://blogtalk.vo.llnwd.net/o23/show/7/709/show_7709943.mp3

Smoking Down, Lung Cancer Up

https://cfrankdavis.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/smoking-down-lung-cancer-up/

In 1950, the first substantial post war antismoking statistics were published. They marked the starting point of a great stampede against smoking. Until now that stampede has lasted 60 years. Although it is showing signs of decay, it has not yet run out of steam.

The pretext for the antismoking stampede was, that by ‘eliminating’ smoking, lung cancer would be ‘eliminated’. While smoking has certainly lost some of its former popularity in the ‘western’ world, lung cancer remains on the rise. In the United States, cigarette sales topped in 1981, with 636 billion cigarettes. While cigarette consumption has almost dropped to half of this figure, the same cannot be said of lung cancer. Lung cancer does not seem to mind whether people smoke or not.

Once a year the American Cancer Association publishes estimates of cancer figures. The 2010 estimates were released recently. Lets have a look at them here:  Cancer Facts and Figures 2010.

Smoking and Lung Cancer Stats

https://cfrankdavis.wordpress.com/2010/10/20/smoking-and-lung-cancer-stats/

“Greece has the highest prevalence of male smoking, but doesn’t have the highest incidence of male lung cancer. That honour goes to Hungary, where there are slightly fewer smokers than in neighbouring Austria.

Russia wins the prize for having the highest prevalence of male smoking, but it doesn’t have the highest incidence of lung cancer.

China is another hard-smoking country, not too far behind Russia, but it has male lung cancer incidence less than the USA, where less than half as many men smoke.

There is a higher prevalence of male smokers in India than in the USA, but only a fifth as much lung cancer.

There is a higher prevalence of smokers in the Yemen than in the USA, but the USA has 14 times as much lung cancer.”

 

Lies, Damned Lies & 400,000 Smoking-related Deaths: Cooking the Data in the Fascists’ Anti-Smoking Crusade

https://www.sott.net/article/229156-Lies-Damned-Lies-400000-Smoking-related-Deaths-Cooking-the-Data-in-the-Fascists-Anti-Smoking-Crusade

“Sterling and his coauthors report that not only is the death rate considerably lower for the CPS sample than for the entire U.S. but, astonishingly, even smokers in the CPS sample have a lower death rate than the national average for both smokers and nonsmokers. As a result, if OTA were to have used the CPS death rate for smokers, applied that rate to the total population, then subtracted the actual number of deaths for all Americans, it would have found that smoking saves 277,621 lives each year. The authors caution, of course, that their calculation is sheer nonsense, not a medical miracle. Those “lives would be saved only if the U.S. population would die with the death rate of smokers in the affluent CPS sample.” Unhappily, the death rate for Americans is considerably higher than that for the CPS sample.

 

Nicotine – The Zombie Antidote by Gabriela Segura, M.D.

https://www.sott.net/article/254745-Nicotine-The-Zombie-Antidote

Yes, tobacco has its pollutants, but they are found in the water we drink, the air we breathe, in baby food, you name it, in even higher concentrations. A conservative estimate is that over 80,000 new chemicals have been introduced into society since the 1800s, only a few hundred of which have been tested for safety; this doesn’t even take into consideration nanotechnology and GMOs, which are already pervasive in the food chain. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, about 2.5 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released annually by large industrial facilities. And the authorities are worried about a plant that produces the learning and memory-enhancing, natural chemical nicotine? It really is laughable. You see what mainstream education indoctrination does to your brain? You breathe thousands of chemicals every time you inhale air, whether you like it or not, and whether or not you are sitting next to a smoker.

“Yes, you’re reading this right; as a doctor, I don’t discourage patients from smoking in this increasingly stressful world. I do encourage them to choose organic tobacco and papers, or to go back to the old traditional ways of smoking pipes or cigars. The smartest people on Earth smoke and it is a veritable sign of the times that smoking is so highly discouraged in this modern, zombie culture.”

Pestilence, the Great Plague and the Tobacco Cure

http://www.sott.net/article/234667-Pestilence-the-Great-Plague-and-the-Tobacco-Cure

“For personal disinfections nothing enjoyed such favour as tobacco; the belief in it was widespread, and even children were made to light up a reaf in pipes. Thomas Hearnes remembers one Tom Rogers telling him that when he was a scholar at Eton in the year that the great plague raged, all the boys smoked in school by order, and that he was never whipped so much in his life as he was one morning for not smoking. It was long afterwards a tradition that none who kept a tobacconist shop in London had the plague.” – A J Bell writing in about 1700.

“When we connect the dots through medicine, science, history, psychology and sociology, the truth emerges plain as day: the all-out global propaganda campaign against tobacco is part of the same push for ‘full-spectrum dominance’ over humanity in all other spheres. The targets and victims of the fake ‘War on Terror’ are the same targets of the war against tobacco. We are expected to believe that our wonderful ‘leaders’ encourage us to eat poisonous GMO food yet are oh, so concerned about the alleged health effects from smoking? Give us a break!”

Let’s All Light Up!

http://www.sott.net/article/139304-Lets-All-Light-Up

Long-Term Smoking Protects Against Parkinson’s, Study Confirms

https://www.sott.net/article/204692-Long-Term-Smoking-Protects-Against-Parkinsons-Study-Confirms

Dr Michael Greger doctor talking about smoking being good for you (tobacco)

20minutes in

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajhX5jWmlL0&feature=youtu.be&t=1177

Medicinal uses of tobacco in history

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079499/

Above, is a mainstream article on the medicinal uses of tobacco that manages to stay within the confines of Establishment acceptability with it’s continual assurance that tobacco is not good for you these days, it was just a fad… nothing to see here

Further reading:

Enough Is Enough: Attitudes to UK Smoking Policies 2016

http://taking-liberties.squarespace.com/blog/2017/1/25/supermarket-sweep-mp-wants-ban-on-sale-of-tobacco-in-major-c.html

The Smoking Scare Debunked by Dr W T Witby

smoking-fascism-screenshot-from-2017-01-24-211254