Impossible Heliocentric Moon Phases Explained



a intro

Please see the video explanation of this first:







Note from the below, how the visible horizon as depicted in modern education (Albeit in the context of so-called celestial parallax)

paralax visible horizon from astronavigationobserved visible true horizon definition, notCrescent Moon at Midnight



Note, no matter how far you extend the moon, it will never rise above the visible horizon line


Gibbous Moon at Midday



Similarly, the gibbous moon will never be above the visible horizon at midday, without changing it’s phasemno


Watch out for these upcoming dates and times during 2019

Gibbous at Midday:



Crescent at Midnight:




Let me know what you see …

We have some excellent observations in for the 12th March 2019, where, according to, the crescent moon was visible at midnight throughout the US.

And so it was :-

crescent midnight newyork

Jenna Freda New York

crescent midnight redhenn travis

Travis (The Plane Truth) from RedHenn Radio

Zach's crescent at midnight florida.PNG

Zachary Zaballa (GuTims4All)


Thanks to all that contributed to this evidence. More to come …



This video is excellent! It has been out for a while now, but I think it marks a seminal shift forward on this stationary plane of ours.

Published on Jul 6, 2017 by Dan Dimension on Youtube, it demonstrates, with some fantastic home shed #TESTIT action, how the noble gasses in our environment coupled with the electric forces of celestial bodies, could attest to the colours we see  in our skys and other phenomena like lightening. This video also shows why there could be a difference between sun light and day light

5 minutes that could possibly catapult our understanding of Earth’s mechanics

If you enjoyed this then do share it about, like & subscribe to Dan Dimension

Flat Earth – Heliocentrism Expires August 21, 2017?


total eclipse Screenshot from 2017-08-02 23:03:52.png

Dear Science: Why does the eclipse shadow travel from west to east?

Did you hear that? “The moon orbits twice as fast as the earth spins”? Now before you slip in helio head-space and point out that the moon travels on it’s orbit at a supposed 2288mph compared the the earth’s supposed spin edge velocity of 1040mph at the equator, which will no doubt form the basis for NASA’s ‘plausible deniability’ in this gaff, listen again. Not only does the NASA ‘Scientist’ say this, he also motions the same with his hands and then an animation showing the moon orbiting the earth nearly 3 times in one 24hr day is shown. I’d like to just point out that ‘if’ the moon orbited the earth twice or more a day, all the phases of the moon would be seen multiple times a day. However the impossibility of the moon phases in the heliocentric theory has never stopped the attempted indoctrination before…. Moving on.

The next animation is what we were all taught in heliocentric Science as to the relationship between the moon’s orbit and the earth’s spin (top left graphic)

NASA | South Up Moon Phase & Libration 2013: Moon with Additional Graphics

So 4 years ago, NASA (and every ‘Science’ book out there today) were saying  the moon orbits the earth in 27-29 days – What changed?

Full NASA Article here:

To explain the 2017 eclipse NASA are having to fudge everything. I’ve seen numerous animations where the earth is spinning from East to West, or the sun is moving and causing a pivoting shadow. Whatever happens, this eclipse will probably be the most watched, analysed and modelled event in a long time. Thanks to Flat Earth realisation.

Following are the arguments for and against the West to East shadow movement caused by the August eclipse and the size of the moon’s shadow on the Earth

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth

The August 21st, 2017 Total Eclipse and the Flat Earth – Part 2

Flat Earth Ground’n’Pounds the Globe

Flat Earth – Heliocentrism Expires August 21, 2017

Flat Earth Eclipse Chat (feat. ‘Flat Earth Math’)

But as with most things on this flat earth, not all agree this is not possible on the ball

The Globe Model Of The Solar Eclipse Is Correct. Not Proof of Flat Earth.

Then I saw this animation on Globebusters (timestamped), which actually makes some sense, but is not how the NASA scientist tried to explain it in the first video.

Full show here

However, one inaccuracy in this animation is that the  moon has been positioned 13 earth diameters away from earth, when the heliocentric model has the moon at 30 earth diameters away.

eclipse animation 13 earth away globebustersScreenshot from 2017-07-31 21:33:08.png

Whether this will change the outcome of the eclipse, I’m not sure as yet, but I will be following it with interest

So, as always, you decide.

I’ll be updating this thread as and when new analysis comes alone. I don’t think this will be the last we’ll hear of this.



Here’s a

360 Study For Total Solar Eclipse At 2017 August 21 In 8K from @Zproxy


More modelling from NASA showing moon’s orbit faster that the earth’s spin

A New View of August’s Total Solar Eclipse


This was probably the video that made me reconsider the West to East shadow movement (why NASA couldn’t have explained this is anyone’s guess)

In the video above the following comment is made

Responsible flatearthers could try to understand the heliocentric model a little better…”

And this statement may well be true, however when we are presented with NASA’s so-called scientists trying to explain how the moon orbits the earth nearly 3 times a day, shows models of this and claims it’s always been this way, then is it any wonder that most of the population is in confusion about what is actually happening in the skys above us?

The video also makes the observation that

I have yet to come across any open world type solar system simulations where you can fly around in a perfect working model”

Why don’t we have these tools available to the public? Maybe the bigger question should be why hasn’t NASA got these tools and accurate simulations in order to explain the eclipse without butchering 500 years of heliocentric fudging in an attempt to reconcile the West to East shadow?

This was an honest look at the heliocentric model, highlighting the many other anomalies which still need answers

And this is (of course) what’s likely happening on our stationary plane in August 2017

Some great AutoCAD & 3D Studio Max work presented by Rob Durham

And here’s a great simple demonstration by a twitter friend Civilian X, which also shows how the shadow can be cast smaller that the casting body


Gyroscope Basics And The Pendulous Vane Fallacy

cockpit of a plane flat horizon Screenshot from 2017-06-06 20:49:16

This post is intended to be a detailed response to the wannabe gyro debunkers that think research means hanging out in debunk forums, cutting and pasting the first excuse that triggers their confirmation bias in defence of the ball busting characteristics posed by gyroscopes.

The fallacy in question is that artificial horizon indicators run by gyroscopes use pendulous vanes to somehow automatically correct for the non-existent curvature of earth.

A Brief History Of Gyros

It’s important to know the time-line of gyroscope development in order to understand that gyros were in constant commercial/private use long before the introduction of any stabilising mechanisms like pendulous vanes, which were largely developed due to the exaggerated aerial manoeuvres needed during times of war.

The earliest patent I could find for a gyroscopic artificial horizon was filled by Joshua Nickerson Rowe in 1892.

first gyroscopic artificial horizon attitude indicator 1893 patentScreenshot from 2017-05-31 19:36:21


Gyroscopes were used in torpedoes and as ship stabilisers and navigation devices before they were used in aircraft. In 1909, Elmer A. Sperry built the first automatic pilot for aircraft using gyroscopes. Later in 1916 the first gyroscopic artificial horizon was used in a plane.

The first patent for a pendulous vanes system was filed in 1941 by the inventor Frederick D. Braddon, with the assignor being the Sperry Gyroscope Company, Inc.

sperry pendulous vane gyroscope 1946 first patent Screenshot from 2017-05-31 19:25:30

So it seems absurd to claim the invention of pendulous vaned gyros in the 40’s were the first to provided curvature correction, when non-stop transatlantic flight by Alcock and Brown was achieved in 1919. They flew from Newfoundland to Ireland which would have needed a curvature correction of more than 400 miles of drop. To realise why this curvature correction is absurd we need to quickly cover the basic principles of a gyro.



Two basic Principles of Gyroscopic Instruments

Gyroscopic instruments are essential instruments used on all aircraft. They provide the pilot with critical attitude and directional information and are particularly important while flying under IFR (Instrument Flight Rules). The sources of power for these instruments can vary. The main requirement is to spin the gyroscopes at a high rate of speed. Originally, gyroscopic instruments were strictly vacuum driven. A vacuum source pulled air across the gyro inside the instruments to make the gyros spin. Later, electricity was added as a source of power. The turning armature of an electric motor doubles as the gyro rotor. Various systems and powering configurations have been developed to provide reliable operation of the gyroscopic instruments.

Three of the most common flight instruments, the attitude indicator, heading indicator, and turn needle of the turn-and-bank indicator, are controlled by gyroscopes. A mechanical gyroscope is comprised of a wheel or rotor with its mass concentrated around its perimeter. The rotor has bearings to enable it to spin at high speeds. [Figure 10-93A]

Different mounting configurations are available for the rotor and axle, which allow the rotor assembly to rotate about one or two axes perpendicular to its axis of spin. To suspend the rotor for rotation, the axle is first mounted in a supporting ring. [Figure 10-93B] The ring and rotor can both move freely 360°. When in this configuration, the gyro is said to be a captive gyro. It can rotate about only one axis that is perpendicular to the axis of spin. [Figure 10-93C]

Attachment of a bracket to the outer ring allows the rotor to rotate in two planes while spinning. Both of these are perpendicular to the spin axis of the rotor. The plane that the rotor spins in due to its rotation about its axle is not counted as a plane of rotation.

A gyroscope with this configuration, two rings plus the mounting bracket, is said to be a free gyro because it is free to rotate about two axes. [Figure 10-93D] As a result, the supporting ring with spinning gyro mounted inside is free to turn 360° inside the outer ring.

pendulous vanes blog gyros Screenshot from 2017-06-06 21:24:49

Unless the rotor of a gyro is spinning, it has no unusual properties; it is simply a wheel universally mounted. When the rotor is rotated at a high speed, the gyro exhibits a couple of unique characteristics. The first is called gyroscopic rigidity, or rigidity in space, meaning the rotor of a free gyro always points in the same direction no matter which way the base of the gyro is positioned. [Figure 10-94]

10-94 pendulous vanes gyroscope around the world Screenshot from 2017-06-06 15:12:11.png

Gyroscopic rigidity depends upon several design factors, including rotor weight, angular velocity, rotor radius and bearing friction

The characteristic of gyros to remain rigid in space is exploited in the attitude-indicating instruments and the directional indicators that use gyros.

Precession is a second important characteristic of gyroscopes, but I won’t go into detail here, suffice to say that by applying a force to the horizontal axis of the gyro, a unique phenomenon occurs.

pendulous vanes gyroscope precession drawing Screenshot from 2017-06-06 16:41:39

There are also Solid State Gyros and Related Systems like Microelectromechanical Based Attitude and Directional Systems (MEMS) & Ring Laser Gyros (RLG) but those are beyond the scope of this post.


So What Do Pendulous Vanes Actually Do

The attitude indicator, or artificial horizon, is one of the most essential flight instruments. It gives the pilot pitch and roll information that is especially important when flying without outside visual references. The attitude indicator operates with a gyroscope rotating in the horizontal plane. Thus, it mimics the actual horizon through its rigidity in space. As the aircraft pitches and rolls in relation to the actual horizon, the gyro gimbals allow the aircraft and instrument housing to pitch and roll around the gyro rotor that remains parallel to the ground.

pendulous vane blog 10-100 Screenshot from 2017-06-06 17:09:19.png

In a typical vacuum-driven attitude gyro system, air is sucked through a filter and then through the attitude indicator in a manner that spins the gyro rotor inside. An erecting mechanism is built into the instrument to assist in keeping the gyro rotor rotating in the intended plane. Precession caused by bearing friction due to air contaminants and other factors makes this necessary.

After air engages the scalloped drive on the rotor, it flows from the instrument to the vacuum pump through four ports. These ports all exhaust the same amount of air when the gyro is rotating in the horizontal plane. When the gyro rotates out of plane, air tends to port out of one side more than another. Vanes close to prevent this, causing more air to flow out of the opposite side. The force from this unequal venting of the air re-erects the gyro rotor. [Figure 10-101]

pendulous vanes figure 10-101 Screenshot from 2017-06-06 17:16:32.png

Early non-pendulous vane vacuum-driven attitude indicators were limited in how far the aircraft could pitch or roll before the gyro gimbals contacted the stoppers, causing abrupt precession and tumbling of the gyro.

Many of these gyros include a caging device. It is used to erect the rotor to its normal operating position prior to flight or after tumbling. More modern gyroscopic instruments are built so they do not tumble, regardless of the angular movement of the aircraft about its axes.

Failings Of The Vacuum Gyro System

In addition to the contamination potential introduced by the air-drive system, other shortcomings exist in the performance of vacuum-driven attitude indicators. Some are induced by the erection mechanism itself.

The pendulous vanes that move to direct airflow out of the gyro respond not only to forces caused by a deviation from the intended plane of rotation, but centrifugal force experienced during turns also causes the vanes to allow asymmetric porting leading to inaccurate display of the aircraft’s attitude, especially in skids and steep banked turns. Also, abrupt acceleration and deceleration imposes forces on the gyro rotor. Suspended in its gimbals, it acts similar to an accelerometer, resulting in a false nose-up or nose-down indication.

Electric attitude indicators Vs Pendulous Vanes

Electric attitude indicators address some of the inherent problems of vacuum-driven attitude indicators. Since there is no air flowing through an electric attitude indicator, air filters, regulators, plumbing lines and vacuum pump(s) are not needed.

Contamination from dirt in the air is not an issue, resulting in the potential for longer bearing life and more accuracy. Erection mechanism ports are not employed, so pendulous vanes are eliminated.

It is still possible that the gyro may experience precession and need to be erected. This is done with magnets [not gravity] rather than vent ports. Typically, electric attitude indicator gyros can be caged manually by a lever and cam mechanism to provide rapid erection. [Figure 10-102]

pendulous vanes blog figure 10-102 Screenshot from 2017-06-06 17:27:32

So as we can see, pendulous vanes have their uses and weaknesses, but one task they cannot perform is the mythical correction for the non-existent curvature of the earth. The simple principles of rigidity in space and precession provide all the knowledge capable of determining whether we are living on a spinning, hurtling, orbiting ball. The only conclusion that we can draw is that the earth is a stationary plane.

Here you can listen to a pilot of over 35 years discuss the gyroscope as the best flat earth proof, whilst explaining the myth of the pendulous vane.



twitter pilot pendulous vanes Screenshot from 2017-06-06 17:28:54.png


Patent sperry pendulous vanes gyroscope attitude indicator 1946

Patent gyroscope horizon 1892


How I make Colloidal Silver

Because of the current over-use of pharmaceutical antibiotics today, many virus and bacteria organisms will be immune to the conventional medicines! Colloidal Silver is not only a way of prevention now, but may possible be our best choice to store for future use.



Colloidal silver is the product the FDA and many mainstream medical people love to hate.  Listening to them you would think every person taking colloidal silver is going to turn gray with silver accumulation in their skin (argyria).  Their worst nightmare is people taking colloidal silver to combat the H1N1 swine flu – the nightmare for them is that it might actually work.  Since I am a health professional who has utilized colloidal silver in practice for more than 15 years with thousands of people, I’m more than happy to share some insights on the subject.

Above from The Colorful History of Colloidal Silver & Other Silver Compounds

Be sceptical of everything you read, my knowledge of the efficacy of silver is from personal experience and experimentation.  The following are just guides, there is a ton of documentation out there to compare and contrast. Remember silver has been in use for 100’s if not 1000’s of years and is the reason why cowboys used to keep a silver dollar in their canteens, and royalty would eat and drink from silver cups and plates. I’ve personally been taking silver on a daily basis for over 2 years, and I can confirm – I am not blue!

Colloidal Silver Guide

Colloidal Silver Resources

PhD on Stationary Earth – YOU Decide if it’s Valid

It’s been poorly translated, but the general ideas are there

The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments

This is what established so called ‘Science’ had to say about it. I don’t know about you but I didn’t read anything about religion in the Journal article, did you?

PhD thesis: The earth is flat

“Last week, a huge scandal rocked the Tunisian and Arab scientific and educational world: a PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to be flat, unmoving, young (only 13,500 years of age), and the centre of the universe.

Going even bolder and further, the student explicitly rejected the physics of Newton and Einstein, the astronomy of Copernicus and Kepler, the cosmology of the Big Bang, the main models of atmospheric and geological activity, and most of modern climatology”

“It was at this stage that fate luckily intervened: a copy of the thesis was “leaked” to the former president of the Tunisian Astronomical Association, who checked that it was not a hoax and then quickly rang the alarm by posting on Facebook the general conclusions of the thesis, verbatim.”

“What we are failing to clarify and communicate is how to distinguish between scientific knowledge (facts, models, theories, etc.) and religious knowledge (what verses mean and what they intend to teach us).”

“I believe the Arab-Muslim world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises, not to mention a total lack of understanding of science, until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and religion, without diminishing the value of each.”