PhD on Stationary Earth – YOU Decide if it’s Valid

It’s been poorly translated, but the general ideas are there

The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments

This is what established so called ‘Science’ had to say about it. I don’t know about you but I didn’t read anything about religion in the Journal article, did you?

PhD thesis: The earth is flat

“Last week, a huge scandal rocked the Tunisian and Arab scientific and educational world: a PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to be flat, unmoving, young (only 13,500 years of age), and the centre of the universe.

Going even bolder and further, the student explicitly rejected the physics of Newton and Einstein, the astronomy of Copernicus and Kepler, the cosmology of the Big Bang, the main models of atmospheric and geological activity, and most of modern climatology”

“It was at this stage that fate luckily intervened: a copy of the thesis was “leaked” to the former president of the Tunisian Astronomical Association, who checked that it was not a hoax and then quickly rang the alarm by posting on Facebook the general conclusions of the thesis, verbatim.”

“What we are failing to clarify and communicate is how to distinguish between scientific knowledge (facts, models, theories, etc.) and religious knowledge (what verses mean and what they intend to teach us).”

“I believe the Arab-Muslim world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises, not to mention a total lack of understanding of science, until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and religion, without diminishing the value of each.”

3 thoughts on “PhD on Stationary Earth – YOU Decide if it’s Valid

  1. Tim May 23, 2017 / 12:16 pm

    Geocentricity and lack of any motion is this student’s contention, but I do not see any reference to the earth being a plane. Did I miss something?


  2. diosescucha August 2, 2019 / 6:39 pm

    Well, once you realize it does not move, the leap to flat and enclosed with a close and small sun and moon follow not far thereafter. That’s what happened to me. When I realized that is absolutely stationery, unmovable, JUST AS THE BIBLE STATES, by studying Michelson-Morley, Michelson-Gale, and Sagnac, then I realized that the Sun and Moon cannot be at the distances they tell us they are, if they’re to orbit us in just 24h.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s